Principle:Snorkel team Snorkel Labeling Function Analysis
| Knowledge Sources | |
|---|---|
| Domains | Weak_Supervision, Data_Quality, Statistics |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-14 20:00 GMT |
Overview
A statistical analysis framework for evaluating the quality, coverage, overlap, and conflict patterns of labeling functions before training a label model.
Description
Labeling Function Analysis provides diagnostic statistics about LF behavior on a dataset. Before investing compute in training a label model, practitioners need to understand how their LFs are performing: which ones have high coverage, which ones agree or conflict with each other, and (if gold labels are available) which ones are empirically accurate.
Key metrics include:
- Coverage: Fraction of data points labeled by an LF (non-abstain rate)
- Overlap: Fraction of data points labeled by multiple LFs
- Conflict: Fraction of data points where LFs disagree
- Empirical accuracy: Agreement with gold labels on a development set
- Polarity: The set of distinct labels an LF produces
These diagnostics are essential for iterative LF development: identifying LFs with low coverage, high conflict rates, or poor accuracy guides the refinement process.
Usage
Use this principle after applying labeling functions and before training a label model. Analyze LF quality to identify poorly performing LFs that should be modified or removed. Repeat analysis iteratively as you refine your LF set.
Theoretical Basis
Given label matrix :
Coverage of LF :
Overlap rate:
Conflict rate:
Empirical accuracy (with gold labels ):