Jump to content

Connect SuperML | Leeroopedia MCP: Equip your AI agents with best practices, code verification, and debugging knowledge. Powered by Leeroo — building Organizational Superintelligence. Contact us at founders@leeroo.com.

Principle:Openai Evals Model Graded Spec Design

From Leeroopedia
Knowledge Sources
Domains Evaluation, LLM_as_Judge
Last Updated 2026-02-14 10:00 GMT

Overview

A specification pattern that defines how an LLM should evaluate model outputs by configuring evaluation prompts, valid choice strings, and scoring rubrics.

Description

Model Graded Spec Design is the process of creating a ModelGradedSpec that configures an LLM-as-judge evaluation. The spec defines: the evaluation prompt template (with placeholders for dynamic content), the valid choice strings the grading model must select from (e.g. "Yes"/"No" or "A"/"B"/"C"), a mapping of sample fields to template placeholders, and optional numeric scores per choice. Specs are stored as YAML files in evals/registry/modelgraded/ and referenced by ModelBasedClassify evaluations. Pre-built specs exist for factual accuracy (fact), closed-QA (closedqa), and head-to-head comparison (battle).

Usage

Design a model-graded spec when creating an evaluation where human-like judgment is needed to assess open-ended model outputs. This includes factual accuracy assessment, quality comparison, style evaluation, and other tasks where exact string matching is insufficient.

Theoretical Basis

A model-graded specification consists of:

  • prompt — Template string or chat prompt with {placeholders} for dynamic content
  • choice_strings — Valid answers the grading model can produce (e.g. ["Yes", "No", "Unsure"])
  • input_outputs — Mapping of sample keys to template variables (e.g. {"input": "completion", "ideal": "expected"})
  • eval_type — Classification strategy: "classify", "classify_cot", "cot_classify"
  • choice_scores — Optional numeric scores per choice (e.g. {"Yes": 1.0, "No": 0.0})

Example fact-checking spec:

prompt: "You are comparing a submitted answer to an expert answer. Is the submission correct? {input} Expert: {ideal} Submitted: {completion}"
choice_strings: ["Yes", "No", "Unsure"]
input_outputs:
  input: completion
  ideal: expected
eval_type: cot_classify
choice_scores:
  "Yes": 1.0
  "No": 0.0
  "Unsure": 0.5

Related Pages

Implemented By

Uses Heuristic

Page Connections

Double-click a node to navigate. Hold to expand connections.
Principle
Implementation
Heuristic
Environment