Principle:Apache Paimon File System Abstraction
| Knowledge Sources | |
|---|---|
| Domains | Storage, File_System |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-08 00:00 GMT |
Overview
Abstract file I/O layer that decouples storage operations from specific filesystem implementations, supporting local and remote storage backends uniformly.
Description
File system abstraction provides a unified interface for storage operations that insulates the data lake implementation from the underlying storage technology. Whether data resides on local disk, distributed filesystems, object stores, or cloud storage services, the abstraction layer presents consistent semantics for reading, writing, listing, and deleting files. This decoupling allows the same table format and query engine code to operate across vastly different storage backends without conditional logic scattered throughout the codebase.
The abstraction defines core operations including opening input streams for reading, creating output streams for writing, listing directory contents, checking file existence, and atomic file operations like rename. Each storage backend implements these operations using native APIs optimized for that storage system's characteristics. Object stores may batch delete operations for efficiency, distributed filesystems may use specialized protocols for metadata operations, and local filesystems may leverage OS-level atomic operations. The abstraction handles edge cases like eventual consistency in object stores by implementing retry logic and consistency checks where needed.
Path handling is unified through an abstract path representation that supports various URI schemes like file://, hdfs://, s3://, and custom protocols. The path abstraction normalizes operations like resolving relative paths, extracting parent directories, and comparing paths across different storage systems. Virtual filesystem capabilities enable advanced features like read-through caches, tiered storage, and storage federation where multiple backends are composed transparently. The abstraction also provides hooks for metrics collection and logging, enabling observability of storage operations across all backends uniformly.
Usage
Apply this principle when building systems that must support multiple storage backends, when storage technology may change over the system's lifetime, or when testing requires mocking storage operations. Use filesystem abstraction when you need to implement cross-cutting concerns like encryption, compression, or caching uniformly across all storage backends, or when storage operations need to be observable and debuggable independent of the underlying implementation.
Theoretical Basis
The filesystem abstraction follows an interface-based design with URI-based routing to backend implementations:
Core FileIO Interface: ``` interface FileIO:
method newInputStream(path: Path) -> InputStream method newOutputStream(path: Path, overwrite: boolean) -> OutputStream method exists(path: Path) -> boolean method delete(path: Path, recursive: boolean) -> boolean method listStatus(path: Path) -> List<FileStatus> method rename(src: Path, dst: Path) -> boolean method makeDirectories(path: Path) -> boolean
```
Path Abstraction: ``` class Path:
scheme: String // "file", "hdfs", "s3", etc. authority: String // host:port or bucket name path: String // absolute path component
method resolve(relative: String) -> Path method getParent() -> Path method getName() -> String method toUri() -> URI
```
Backend Selection by URI Scheme: ``` class FileIOFactory:
implementations: Map<String, FileIOProvider>
method getFileIO(path: Path) -> FileIO: scheme = path.getScheme() provider = implementations.get(scheme) return provider.create(path.getAuthority())
```
Atomic Write Pattern: To provide atomic file creation across backends with varying guarantees: ``` function atomicWrite(path: Path, data: bytes):
tempPath = path.getParent().resolve(".tmp-" + randomUUID())
stream = fileIO.newOutputStream(tempPath)
stream.write(data)
stream.close()
if fileIO.rename(tempPath, path): return success else: fileIO.delete(tempPath) throw AtomicWriteFailedException
```
Consistency Handling for Eventually Consistent Stores: ``` function readAfterWrite(path: Path, maxRetries: int) -> InputStream:
for attempt in 1 to maxRetries:
if fileIO.exists(path):
return fileIO.newInputStream(path)
sleep(exponentialBackoff(attempt))
throw FileNotFoundException
```
Virtual Filesystem Composition: ``` class CachedFileIO implements FileIO:
delegate: FileIO cache: Cache<Path, bytes>
method newInputStream(path: Path) -> InputStream:
if cache.contains(path):
return ByteArrayInputStream(cache.get(path))
stream = delegate.newInputStream(path)
data = stream.readAll()
cache.put(path, data)
return ByteArrayInputStream(data)
```
Path Factory Pattern: To generate standard path structures for table metadata: ``` class FileStorePathFactory:
basePath: Path
method snapshotPath(snapshotId: long) -> Path:
return basePath.resolve("snapshot/snapshot-" + snapshotId)
method manifestPath(manifestName: String) -> Path:
return basePath.resolve("manifest/" + manifestName)
method dataFilePath(partition: String, fileName: String) -> Path: return basePath.resolve(partition).resolve(fileName)
```
This abstraction enables storage backend independence while maintaining consistent semantics across diverse storage technologies.
Related Pages
Implementation:Apache_Paimon_Path Implementation:Apache_Paimon_FileIO Implementation:Apache_Paimon_PaimonVirtualFileSystem Implementation:Apache_Paimon_UriReader Implementation:Apache_Paimon_FileStorePathFactory