Jump to content

Connect SuperML | Leeroopedia MCP: Equip your AI agents with best practices, code verification, and debugging knowledge. Powered by Leeroo — building Organizational Superintelligence. Contact us at founders@leeroo.com.

Implementation:FlagOpen FlagEmbedding LLM Embedder LM Score

From Leeroopedia
Revision as of 14:59, 16 February 2026 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Auto-imported from implementations/FlagOpen_FlagEmbedding_LLM_Embedder_LM_Score.md)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Knowledge Sources
Domains Language_Modeling, Knowledge_Distillation, Negative_Likelihood
Last Updated 2026-02-09 00:00 GMT

Overview

Script for computing language model scores on query-passage-answer triplets to generate teacher signals for retrieval model training.

Description

This implementation computes negative log-likelihoods (NLLs) using a language model to score how well passages answer queries, creating teacher scores for knowledge distillation in retrieval training.

Process: 1. For each query, scores all candidate passages (positives and negatives) by computing the NLL of generating the answer conditioned on query + passage 2. Passages that lead to lower perplexity (more natural answer generation) receive higher scores 3. Scores are collated by query and saved back to the dataset as "teacher_scores" field

Task-specific formatting:

  • QA tasks: "Knowledge: {passage}\n\nQuestion: {query}\n\nAnswer: {answer}"
  • Chat tasks: "{history}\nSpeaker 1: {query}\nSpeaker 2: {answer}"
  • ICL tasks: "{few_shot_examples}\n{query}\n{answer}"
  • LRLM tasks: Uses pre-tokenized inputs for long-range language modeling

The process_lm_scoring() function handles tokenization and label preparation, masking all tokens except the answer portion for NLL computation. This focuses the scoring on answer quality rather than question understanding.

Usage

Use this to generate teacher scores from a strong language model for distilling retrieval knowledge into smaller embedding models.

Code Reference

Source Location

Signature

def process_lm_scoring(tokenizer, key_max_length=512)

def collate_scores(eval_data, save_name)

def main()  # Entry point with ScoreArgs

Import

from research.llm_embedder.run_lm_score import main

I/O Contract

Inputs

Name Type Required Description
eval_data str Yes Path to JSON with query, pos, neg, answers fields
model_name_or_path str Yes Language model for scoring (e.g., LLaMA, GPT)
key_max_length int No Max length for truncating passages (default: 512)
lm_batch_size int No Batch size for LM inference (default: 4)
save_name str No Name for output file (default: "llama2-7b-chat")

Outputs

Name Type Description
scored_file JSONL Original data with added "teacher_scores" field for each query
query_ids List Query IDs
scores List NLL scores for each passage per query

Usage Examples

# Command line usage
python research/llm_embedder/run_lm_score.py \
    --eval_data train_data.json \
    --model_name_or_path meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf \
    --key_max_length 512 \
    --lm_batch_size 4 \
    --save_name llama2-7b-chat \
    --lm_dtype bf16

# Input format (train_data.json):
# {"query": "What is machine learning?",
#  "answers": ["A field of AI..."],
#  "pos": ["Machine learning is..."],
#  "neg": ["Deep learning...", "AI is..."]}

# Output format (train_data.scored.llama2-7b-chat.json):
# {"query": "What is machine learning?",
#  "answers": ["A field of AI..."],
#  "pos": ["Machine learning is..."],
#  "neg": ["Deep learning...", "AI is..."],
#  "teacher_scores": [-2.34, -4.56, -5.12]}  # Lower = better

# These scores can then be used for distillation:
# python train.py --train_data train_data.scored.llama2-7b-chat.json

Related Pages

Page Connections

Double-click a node to navigate. Hold to expand connections.
Principle
Implementation
Heuristic
Environment